Doc Tracy tracks down the California bureaucrat leading a sinister hunt to silence and terminate doctors from the frontlines. Exposing pseudoscience, fake news, and fraudulent experts ~ crack the case at DocTracy.org

In March of 2020 Emma Burkey got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine because she worked with young children and was told she was putting their lives at risk. She expect the tragic turn her life would change after that decision. On April 2nd she had a seizure and was rushed to the hospital. After four strokes and three brain surgeries she is now confined to a wheelchair with little to no ability to move her arms or walk. She and many doctors believe this is the direct result of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Chris was working with a fully vaccinated film crew when he was infected with Coronavirus, but the truth about early treatment championed by America’s Frontline Doctors gave him peace of mind, and a fully successful recovery. 

One by one, each member of this senior-age group family was infected with Coronavirus, but the truth about early treatment championed by America’s Frontline Doctors gave them peace of mind, and a fully successful recovery.

A local restaurant owner exercised Constitutional rights with both strength and humor, demonstrating the resolve it takes to retain our sacred American right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Real Stories of Frontline Interventions, featuring Lidia. This dedicated mother with a special needs child was sick and fearing the worst, until she found a life-saving solution at America’s Frontline Doctors.

The FBI’s Violent Attempt To Silence AFLDS”. What if you were a frontline doctor, who tried to warn her country that we are all being lied to; and that people don’t have to die?

A History of Women Arrested for Demanding Equality. History is not written by the faint of heart, and America has an inspiring tradition of strong women who demonstrated courage in their commitment to equal gender, race, and medical rights...even to the point of being arrested and jailed for it.

Make A Stand, a stirring invitation to stand for truth, the sanctity of human life, and the freedom we could soon lose, unless we unite and fight to preserve it.

The Normal Symbol, a “comic sense” response to pathetically patronizing celebrity advertising.

#ProtectTheChildren, a powerful short film and a critical campaign exposing the dangerous lack of proper risk assessment and missing long term safety data that makes the recent fervent push to inoculate children so incredibly reckless and unethical.

A heart-warming group participation in the historic song “We Are The World” with a striking performance of symbolism to demonstrate a unified return to truth, respect, and human freedom.

In its second secret video drop in two days, Project Veritas caught a Twitter executive on hidden camera mocking Elon Musk for having Asperger’s Syndrome. The world’s richest man <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57045770">revealed</a> his condition only last year during an appearance on Saturday Night Live.&nbsp;Twitter Lead Client Partner Alex Martinez unwittingly made the remarks to an undercover Project Veritas journalist during what he thought was a date.&nbsp;“He has Asperger’s,” Martinez says in the video.&nbsp;“So he’s ‘special.' I’m like, ‘You’re … special needs. You’re literally special needs."Musk responded to the video Wednesday, though not in his usual buoyant manner.&nbsp;“Twitter exec trashing free speech &amp; mocking people with Asperger’s...” he tweeted.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Twitter exec trashing free speech &amp; mocking people with Asperger’s …— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1526724641976352769?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Martinez went on to confirm what another Twitter employee divulged in a video from a day earlier, which is that Twitter has no interest in free speech.&nbsp;“The rest of us who have been here believe in something that’s good for the planet and not just to give people free speech,” Martinez says.&nbsp;He then seemed to suggest that people are not intelligent enough to make their own decisions, which is where people like himself come in.&nbsp;“The rest of us who have been here believe in something that’s good for the planet and not just to give people free speech,” Martinez says.&nbsp;“It’s gonna be hard for [Musk] to be like, ‘Uh, because people should be able to make their own decisions. It’s like people don’t know how to make a rational decision if you don’t put out correct things that are supposed to be out in the public.”&nbsp;But not only is Martinez – and apparently his employer – not committed to free speech, they are unapologetically committed to censorship.&nbsp;“As an advertiser, as my business what I do every day and why I go out is like, we want [Twitter] to be as fair and transparent and accurate as possible and if that means there’s a level of censorship to make it correct, quote unquote. Again, and what does correct mean? I guess like, it just kind of goes into the idea of, like, what is correct?” the executive said, intimating that the definition of “correct” is what Twitter employees decide it is.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="100%" height="500" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uoy7V_VQGnU" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>Then, in a rare stroke of irony, Martinez confirmed&nbsp;to the undercover Project Veritas journalist that Twitter warned its employees about speaking to undercover Project Veritas journalists.&nbsp;The journalist read from a Twitter company warning to its employees to be careful about what they say.&nbsp;“It says ‘groups like Project Ve-ree-tas are active right now,'” the journalist said, pretending to be unfamiliar with his own organization. “What the f*** is that?”&nbsp;“It’s like some group that is trying to just out the employees,” Martinez replied. “Like, they’re trying to go out on dates with them, like this. And record them and then go sell it to The New York Times and say, ‘This is what the Twitter employee just said.'”&nbsp;“You’re lucky you just met me organically, because otherwise, I would be questioning everything about you,” he adds.&nbsp;Project Veritas released the video Wednesday with the caption, “We’re lucky we met you organically, too!”&nbsp;The video comes a day after Project Veritas released <a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/twitter-employee-confirms-commie-culture" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">another undercover video</a> showing one of Twitter's chief engineer's admitting that Twitter “doesn't believe in free speech” and revealing the company's “Commie” culture.

large_iStock-1313167034.jpg

medium_iStock-1313167034.jpg

small_iStock-1313167034.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1313167034.jpg

iStock-1313167034.jpg

US News

Exec also praised censorship and warned about talking to undercover journalists

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism

Elon Musk has backed Twitter into a corner, forcing the company to make an impossible choice and jeopardizing his own acquisition of the company.&nbsp;The billionaire inventor began questioning earlier this month a filing by Twitter Inc. which claims that fake accounts or bots – automated Twitter accounts not operated by real users – make up 5% or less of Twitter’s user base.&nbsp;Musk has not been subtle in doubting the company’s claim and even placed the acquisition deal on hold until the numbers are confirmed.&nbsp;The numbers are significant not just because of Twitter’s valuation, but because of the potential fallout if advertisers were to find out that their audience was much smaller than represented by the company.&nbsp;"Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users,"&nbsp;the Tesla CEO tweeted Friday, before announcing that he would sample 100 random followers to see how many of them were fake and invited others to do the same.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">To find out, my team will do a random sample of 100 followers of <a href="https://twitter.com/Twitter?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@twitter</a>. I invite others to repeat the same process and see what they discover …— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1525291586669531137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>“There is some chance it might be over 90% of daily active users, which is the metric that matters to advertisers,” wrote Musk on Sunday. “Very odd that the most popular tweets of all time were only liked by ~2% of daily active users.”&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">There is some chance it might be over 90% of daily active users, which is the metric that matters to advertisers. Very odd that the most popular tweets of all time were only liked by ~2% of daily active users.— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1525727450872926209?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>On Tuesday, Musk posted a poll on Twitter.&nbsp;“Twitter claims that &gt;95% of daily active users are real, unique humans. Does anyone have that experience?” He offered two possible responses, one with two laughing emojis, and one that said “Who me??” next to an icon of a robot.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Twitter claims that &gt;95% of daily active users are real, unique humans. Does anyone have that experience?— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1526598807722549248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>As of this article, 52.1% of the 1.5 million+ votes chose the laughing emojis, while 47.9% chose the robot response.&nbsp;Musk seems to have been vindicated by a Tuesday <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/half-joe-biden-twitter-followers-are-fake-audit-elon-musk-1707244">report</a> from Newsweek that nearly half of Joe Biden’s 22.2 million followers are fake. &nbsp;According to the audit, 49.3 percent of Biden’s followers are not real, meaning that the man who claims to be the&nbsp;“most popular president in history” is working with 10.9 million less accounts than what is displayed on the platform.&nbsp;“Interesting,” Musk tweeted along with a link to the article. “So … [checks calculator] … that would be like 10 times more than 5%.”&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">So … [checks calculator] … that would be like 10 times more than 5%— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1526834598935949312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>If this is found to be the case across the board, then Twitter will face a difficult choice. The company can either a) kill the deal with Musk and open itself to a volley of lawsuits by shareholders for value destruction; or b) admit that the number of fake accounts are higher than 5%, close the deal with Musk at a much lower price and open itself to a volley of lawsuits from advertisers.&nbsp;Either way, Twitter is facing a firing squad, and it is unclear if this was Musk’s plan all along.&nbsp;“There is no way Elon Musk is going to buy Twitter at such a ridiculous price, especially since realizing it is a company largely based on BOTS or Spam accounts. Fake anyone?” wrote President Donald Trump on TruthSocial. “By the time you get rid of them, if that can even be done, what do you have? Not much? If it weren’t for the ridiculous Billion Dollar breakup fee, Elon would have already been long gone.”&nbsp;<figure class="image image_resized" style="width:50%;"><img src="/uploads/trump_1a_a4946c85ef.jpg"></figure>

large_iStock-1364148656.jpg

medium_iStock-1364148656.jpg

small_iStock-1364148656.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1364148656.jpg

iStock-1364148656.jpg

Legal News

Nearly half Joe Biden’s 22.2 million followers are fake

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice

United States Surgeon General Vivek Murthy in March published a request for information (RFI) on the “impact of health misinformation throughout the COVID-19 pandemic”. The RFI is a probe to find dissenters who challenge the vaccine and promote cheap, effective treatments&nbsp;such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.&nbsp;But in a response earlier this month, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita replied with a <a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/INAG/2022/05/16/file_attachments/2159907/Indiana%20Attorney%20General%20COVID%20Misinformation%20Submission.pdf">letter</a> that was likely not what Murthy expected.&nbsp;&nbsp;The letter, cosigned by Stanford University School of Medicine Prof. Jay Bhattacharya and Brownstone Institute’s Dr. Kulldorff, listed nine different ways the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) fed the public misinformation about COVID-19.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">US <a href="https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Surgeon_General</a> asked all 50 states for examples and impact of covid misinformation. Indiana attorney general <a href="https://twitter.com/ToddRokitaIN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ToddRokitaIN</a> responded with a long list of misinformation pushed by <a href="https://twitter.com/CDCgov?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CDCgov</a>.<a href="https://t.co/r7nlfZ4jdC">https://t.co/r7nlfZ4jdC</a>— Martin Kulldorff (@MartinKulldorff) <a href="https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1526586882326421504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>“We agree that misinformation has been a major problem during the pandemic,” the letter began after referencing Murthy’s original request.&nbsp;“As such, the disinformation has led to great harm in the lives and livelihoods of Americans. We submit the following examples of disinformation from the CDC and other health organizations that have shattered the public’s trust in science and public health and will take decades to repair,” added Rokita et al.&nbsp;The first way the CDC misinformed the public, according to the letter, was overcounting COVID-19 deaths.&nbsp;“The official tallies include many people who have died with rather than from COVID-19. CDC has not distinguished deaths where COVID-19 was the primary cause of death, where COVID-19 was a contributing cause of death, or where the death was entirely unrelated to COVID-19, but they incidentally tested positive.”&nbsp;Second, the CDC spread claims that vaccine-caused immunity is superior to natural immunity.&nbsp;“Using seriously flawed studies, CDC falsely claimed that natural immunity is worse than vaccine acquired immunity...Most critically, by mandating vaccination for people who have recovered from COVID-19, the government, corporations, and universities de facto deny natural immunity.” The letter went on to cite evidence of the superiority of natural immunity.&nbsp;Third, the CDC misled the public by promising that the vaccines prevent COVID-19 transmission, likely causing millions of people to vaccinate based on that debunked claim.&nbsp;“This was also the rationale for vaccine mandates and passports -- to prevent the spread of the virus to others. At the time, we did not know, and it turned out to be wrong....vaccinated individuals spread the disease to others,” the letter said, noting that the CDC’s randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies did not even attempt to study transmission.&nbsp;Fourth, the CDC promised that school closures were effective, keeping them closed long after science had already shown the claim to be false.&nbsp;“This decision was based on false claims that it would protect children, teachers, and the community at large. Already in the early summer of 2020, we knew this was false,” wrote the letter’s authors before citing 2020 data from Sweden showing that school closures were ineffective in preventing virus spread.&nbsp;The letter also observed that a 2020 study on school closures published in the New England Journal of Medicine did not even include the Swedish data, “which is like evaluating a new drug without including data from the placebo comparison group.”&nbsp;Fifth, the CDC led the public to believe that everyone is equally at risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 causing devastating lockdowns and school closures.&nbsp;“Though the risk of death is high for the old and some other vulnerable populations with severe chronic illness, the risk posed to children from COVID-19 infection is on par with the risk posed by a bad influenza season.”&nbsp;But according to a survey cited in the letter, both old and young overestimate their risks of hospitalization and death from COVID-19.&nbsp;“This misperception about risk is harmful because it leads to demand for policies – such as school closures and lockdowns – that were themselves harmful.”&nbsp;Sixth, the CDC claimed that there was no better alternative to lockdowns, even as tens of thousands of doctors signed the 2020 Great Barrington Declaration opposing lockdowns and offering concrete, feasible alternative solutions.&nbsp;But the CDC ignored them all, causing American citizens to be forced&nbsp;into lockdowns even as other countries like Sweden remained open with almost no excess deaths.&nbsp;“Lockdowns are an aberration– a sharp deviation from traditional public health management of respiratory epidemics – and a catastrophic failure of public health policy,” noted the letter.&nbsp;Seventh, the CDC continues to claim that masks are effective against COVID-19, despite <a href="https://fee.org/articles/new-study-finds-mask-mandate-failed-to-reduce-covid-deaths-hospitalizations-or-cases/">evidence</a> to the contrary.&nbsp;“It is thus unsurprising that the highest quality evidence available – randomized trials – conducted both <a href="https://europepmc.org/article/med/20091588">before</a> and <a href="https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-face-masks-community-first-update.pdf">during</a> the pandemic find that masks are ineffective at stopping the spread of respiratory viruses in most settings when worn by untrained people.”&nbsp;Eighth, the CDC misinformed the public about the effectiveness of mass testing asymptomatic people and contact tracing.&nbsp;“Mass testing of asymptomatic individuals with contact tracing and quarantining of people who test positive has failed to substantively slow the progress of the epidemic and has imposed great costs on people who were quarantined even though they posed no risk of infecting others.”&nbsp;The letter also enumerated the heavy costs of&nbsp;quarantines.&nbsp;“At the same time, quarantining people is costly – for workers without adequate sick leave, absenteeism due to contact tracing means pay cuts, lost opportunities, and perhaps even an inability to feed families.&nbsp;“For children, it means more skipped lessons and missed opportunities for academic and social growth at school, with long-run negative consequences for their future prospects.”&nbsp;Lastly, the CDC misled the public by making “the eradication of COVID-19 a feasible goal”, from “two weeks to flatten the curve” and onwards.&nbsp;“However, SARS-CoV-2 has none of the characteristics of a disease that can be eradicated,” the letter reads, explaining how “even if it was eradicated from the human race, zoomatic transmission would guarantee that it would come back.” In addition, eradicating COVID-19 would require a global commitment from every country, even the developing ones for whom COVID-19 is not a pressing matter.&nbsp;

large_iStock-1094346398.jpg

medium_iStock-1094346398.jpg

small_iStock-1094346398.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1094346398.jpg

iStock-1094346398.jpg

Pushback-Resistance

Who is really responsible for COVID-19 misinformation?

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply 

New measures put forth by the Biden administration Monday “to support the Cuban people” will ease restrictions on the country and further enrich its communist regime.&nbsp;“Today, the United States is taking a series of measures to increase support for the Cuban people in line with our national security interests,” said the administration in a <a href="https://www.state.gov/biden-administration-measures-to-support-the-cuban-people/">statement</a>. &nbsp;“The Cuban people are confronting an unprecedented humanitarian crisis — and our policy will continue to focus on empowering the Cuban people to help them create a future free from repression and economic suffering.”&nbsp;The statement then goes on to say that the U.S. government will allow more tourism to Cuba, thereby enriching the regime, and push to help entrepreneurs in Cuba by assisting the country with cloud technology and payment processing.&nbsp;The White House will also be removing the $1,000 limit on money that can be sent to the country and will allow money to be sent from non-familial sources.&nbsp;<figure class="image image_resized image-style-align-right" style="width:50%;"><img src="/uploads/i_Stock_1311150677_1b931ef1e3.jpg"></figure>The Biden administration will just now start to process visas for Cuban immigrants. A senior White House administration official said on a <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2022/05/17/background-press-call-by-senior-administration-officials-on-new-cuba-policy/">background press call</a> Monday that the administration is staffing up to admit 20,000 immigrants.&nbsp;The news comes after the White House has committed to allowing 100,000 Ukrainian refugees into the country in addition to the tens of thousands of Afghan refugees already let in. In the 2022 fiscal year alone, the U.S. has allowed 836,000 illegal aliens to swarm across its southern border.&nbsp;During last year's protests by the Cuban people against President Miguel Diaz-Canel, the Biden administration told Cuban refugees that they were not welcome in the United States, even as it kept its southern border open to illegals.&nbsp;"Allow me to be clear: If you take to the sea, you will not come to the United States,"&nbsp;<a href="https://news.yahoo.com/bidens-dhs-chief-warned-cuban-113052839.html">warned</a>&nbsp;Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.&nbsp;Many pointed out the fact that immigrants from Mexico typically have voting patterns favorable to Biden, unlike immigrants from Cuba.&nbsp;The Biden administration also ignored a request from Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to supply Cuban protestors with internet access via satellite after the Communist government shut down social media to quell the protests. DeSantis then <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2021/07/13/floridas-desantis-wants-us-companies-to-give-cuba-free-internet-amid-its-continued-protests/?sh=7e3087853fcf">called</a> on Florida companies to assist where the federal government would not.&nbsp;Now, DeSantis slammed Biden for the new measures that will ease restrictions on Cuba’s Communist regime.&nbsp;“Biden’s plan to prop up the Cuban dictatorship represents yet another failure when it comes to standing for freedom in our hemisphere,” DeSantis wrote on social media.&nbsp;“Money from ‘tourism’ will go into the pockets of the Cuban regime – and will help fortify the government against those seeking freedom in Cuba,” he added.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Biden's plan to prop up the Cuban dictatorship represents yet another failure when it comes to standing for freedom in our hemisphere. Money from "tourism" will go into the pockets of the Cuban regime - and will help fortify the government against those seeking freedom in Cuba.— Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) <a href="https://twitter.com/GovRonDeSantis/status/1526578735012581377?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>Cuban-American Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) also weighed in on the changes.&nbsp;“The regime in #Cuba threatened Biden with mass migration and have sympathizers inside the administration and the result is today we see the first steps back to the failed Obama policies on Cuba,” he wrote.&nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The regime in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cuba?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cuba</a> threatened Biden with mass migration and have sympathizers inside the administration and the result is today we see the first steps back to the failed Obama policies on Cuba— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) <a href="https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1526331389066493952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>DeSantis is known for his strong stance against communism.Earlier this month, America's Frontline News <a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/cuban-americans-help-institute-victims-of-communism-day" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> that DeSantis had signed an executive order instituting Victims of Communism Day, an initiative inspired by Cuban-Americans.

large_iStock-162970456.jpg

medium_iStock-162970456.jpg

small_iStock-162970456.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-162970456.jpg

iStock-162970456.jpg

World News

'The regime in #Cuba threatened Biden with mass migration and have sympathizers inside the administration'

Biden claims to ‘support the Cuban people’ by strengthening communist state

large_iStock-1268549684.jpg

medium_iStock-1268549684.jpg

small_iStock-1268549684.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1268549684.jpg

iStock-1268549684.jpg

Medical

COVID-19 vaccines and herd immunity – a changing narrative fraudulent from the start?

Though she describes homeschooling as “incredible”, Christa Kachurak says it didn’t start out that way.&nbsp;“To be truthful, our family was not supportive in the beginning,” Christa told America’s Frontline News in Part 2 of her <a href="https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/lines-in-the-sand-homeschooling-with-the-kachuraks">interview</a>. “This was, you know, ‘I think you're going to take away from him socially. I think that this is not a great choice. I think he needs to get out of the house with peers.’" &nbsp;<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe class="rumble" width="640" height="360" src="https://rumble.com/embed/v12gj0o/?pub=vbksd" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>But Christa and her husband Drew stood firm, cut out the noise, and decided to make the homeschooling experience as exciting and fulfilling as possible for the whole family.&nbsp;Most importantly, they got honest with themselves.&nbsp;“There are days that you're not going to get done what you plan to get done,” says Christa. “There are days that you're going to feel behind. There are days that you're going to question yourself, but the truth of the matter is that's parenting in general.”&nbsp;“I mean, if you have children, there's so many days that we're like what are we doing? Are we doing the right thing by them? But we have these children for a reason and it's our opportunity to show them that education can be fulfilling. It can be exciting.”&nbsp;The Kachurak kids already finished their school year and won’t pick up again until August.&nbsp;Christa says that many parents who hear that she homeschools her children mistakenly assume she has patience. But it’s really all about practice.&nbsp;“I am absolutely not patient enough, but I have a lot more time to practice and just like anything, the more we practice it, the better we get.”&nbsp;So when Max gets frustrated, Christa uses it as an opportunity to teach him how to grow.&nbsp;“So the more opportunities I get when we get frustrated and we're trying to learn fractions, I can show him, ‘Hey. Mom sees that you're getting frustrated. Let's take a step back. Go outside, go throw the ball for 20 minutes. Come back in, let's conquer this together.’&nbsp;“And not only does that create studying skills for him moving forward, that's how we're going to deal with things as an adult. When something gets too stressful, too overwhelming, I'm going to take a break, a step back. I'm going to breathe. And then I'm going to come back and conquer it.”&nbsp;When asked about the children’s social lives, Christa first suggested that anything is better than the social milieu in public schools. &nbsp;“Just because there's other children present, doesn't mean it's positive,” she says.&nbsp;“We would see the kids outside and hear their conversations and the fear and the bullying and the things that these kids were saying to each other on the playground. My husband and I would just look at each other and say that is not the type of socialization that we want our children to be around.”&nbsp;The Kachuraks mingle with other families in their neighborhood, especially at church or sports events, and as many as 15 other children have been known to end up at the Kachurak house.&nbsp;“It is something that we get to really, really be a part of with the children, parents and creating this community where our kids know how to be respectful. They know how to be kind. And they know when to come to us when they need a little help,” says Christa.&nbsp;One aspect of homeschool that Christa finds tougher than public school is taking responsibility. In public school, any issues or shortcomings can be blamed on the administration or a host of other parties.&nbsp;But there's nowhere to hide in homeschool, and that means self-improvement.&nbsp;“If it's falling apart, it's on you,” says Christa. “It's not on your children, it's not on your spouse, it's on you. And so I've had to do such deep reflective work on myself in order to step up as the parent that they need, and I don't think I would have had that opportunity had they been in school because you only see them for short bits of time.”&nbsp;She concluded by saying that for her and her husband, homeschool isn’t so much an option as a necessity.&nbsp;“It's become less of like a cute little culture, like this homeschool culture, and it's become this aggressive momma bear ‘You will not get in my way.’&nbsp;“I will protect these children with everything I have,” she added. “And that's which has created such a strength in me and in my husband and in our kids. And I think that if homeschooling is not working, check in with yourself. And that's OK because we do that as parents.&nbsp;“We have to really focus, like are we doing the best job that we can. And I mess up every single day. I fall short every single day. But I've got 2 little kids here staring at me, like, OK, mom, pick yourself up, let's try again.”&nbsp;

large_iStock-1304677250.jpg

medium_iStock-1304677250.jpg

small_iStock-1304677250.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1304677250.jpg

iStock-1304677250.jpg

'Education can be fulfilling. It can be exciting'

Homeschooling with the Kachuraks (Part II)

Next week, May 22-28, the World Health Assembly, governing body of the World Health Organization (WHO), will meet to vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).&nbsp; The amendments can be seen <a href="https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4">here</a>.&nbsp; The IHR and the new amendments if passed, are legally binding on the United States and on all United Nations member states as a matter of international law.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.americaoutloud.com/biden-handing-over-u-s-sovereignty-to-who/">According</a> to Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin in their report on this issue, “These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on&nbsp;his personal opinion&nbsp;or&nbsp;consideration&nbsp;that there is a&nbsp;potential or possible&nbsp;threat to other nations.” The amendments eliminate the requirement to consult with the affected member state.In addition, the WHO will be empowered to collaborate with other nations to deal with a declared health crisis even against the wishes of the affected nation.&nbsp;America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) position statement on these amendments puts it this way, “The WHO would have the power to decide what constitutes a&nbsp;‘pandemic’ and to decide quarantine measures on a global scale. WHO would control the development and safety of new treatments and would decide vaccine mandates for each country! . . .&nbsp;the proposed amendments empower the corrupt Director-General to unilaterally declare a health emergency in any&nbsp;nation even against the opinion of that nation for any&nbsp;illness that is widespread.”Incredibly, the Biden administration proposed the amendments.&nbsp; According to AFLDS’ position paper, “This amendment . . . will serve to give away our country’s healthcare system, national sovereignty, and personal freedoms to the WHO on a silver platter.&nbsp; America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) strongly opposes the creation and implementation of any treaty or international instrument that governs world pandemic preparedness and response.”Succinctly put, the upshot of these amendments is to surrender sovereignty to the WHO regarding very broadly defined public health crises subject to the whim of the WHO Director-General.&nbsp; The current Director-General is not even a physician and is wholly unqualified.&nbsp; Even if he were qualified there is no scenario in which this ends well.<a href="https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18534/who-death-trap">According</a> to Peter Hoekstra former&nbsp;Chairman and Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee and more recently&nbsp;US ambassador to the Netherlands during the Trump administration, “. . .&nbsp;this ‘next pandemic’ is neither far off nor a hypothetical&nbsp;‘conspiracy theory’. According to multiple credible reports from the U.S. Department of State, to the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Peter Jennings, China has been preparing for bio-warfare using pathogens for more than six years.” It is no surprise that one of the amendments requires transferring genetic sequence data to the WHO.In fact, the Trump administration pulled out of the WHO primarily because of its “mistakes” at the beginning of the COVID pandemic, including its deferential approach towards China.&nbsp; According to Hoekstra, “Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party.”Placing our health policies in the hands of this man in particular who is beholden to the Chinese Communists is terrifying indeed.We must do everything in our power to stop these amendments from being ratified.

large_iStock-1216302819.jpg

medium_iStock-1216302819.jpg

small_iStock-1216302819.jpg

thumbnail_iStock-1216302819.jpg

iStock-1216302819.jpg

". . . the upshot of these amendments is to surrender sovereignty to the WHO regarding very broadly defined public health crises subject to the whim of the WHO Director-General."

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab  

Tampa, FL – April 18, 2022. Federal Judge, Kathryn Kimball Mizelle granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement, ruling that “the Mask Mandate exceeds the CDC’s statutory authority and violates the procedures required for agency rulemaking under the APA.The suit was filed by Health Freedom Defense Fund, Ana Daza, and Sarah Pope. Both Daza and Pope alleged they suffer from anxiety which is worsened by having to wear a mask. Both have been flying less as a result of the CDC’s mandate.The CDC attempted to argue that masks are a form of sanitation and that they are statutorily authorized to make rules for this purpose. Judge Mizelle ruled that sanitation is limited to property, and stated thatthe mandate curtails a person’s freedom of movement “in a way similar to detention or quarantine”. Furthermore, Judge Mizelle pointed out that the CDC has the power to limit a person’s travel between States only when a person is “reasonably believed to be infected”. The Court also disagreed with the Government's contention that they have the power to mandate masks under Interstate commerce.Every allegation made by the Government to legalize their authoritarian mandate was shot down by the Judge and a thoughtful explanation within the Order. You can read the entire Order <a href="https://healthfreedomdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/DE-53-ORDER-GRANTING-SJ-TO-PLAINTIFFS.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>Since the beginning of this pandemic, AFLDS has publicly condemned mandates, including the Mask Mandate, as an authoritarian takeover of our rights. We are pleased to see the outcome of this case and believe that this can be used as positive law in future cases as we continue to regain our rights throughout the Country.On Wednesday, April 21, 2022, the CDC filed an appeal against the ruling. AFLDS will be filing an amicus curiae brief in support of the appellees.

Federal Judge Grants Motion for Summary Judgement Striking Down CDC’s Mask Mandate

Salt Lake City, UT – April 1, 2022. Plaintiff Dr. Devan Griner, double-board certified in General Surgery and Plastic Surgery, filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction against the Biden Administration to halt the unconstitutional mandate currently requiring him to receive COVID-19 medical treatments to continue to work.&nbsp;The Defendants include Biden, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This “CMS Mandate” became effective on November 5, 2021. It requires every healthcare worker who is employed at a facility receiving Medicare and Medicaid funding to receive COVID-19 injections as a condition of employment. Those who refuse are threatened with termination.Dr. Griner, who specializes in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery, has magnanimously dedicated his life to performing surgery on children, and often on a gratis basis. He contends the injections are an unwanted medical treatment, not a vaccine and the injections do not provide Covid-19 immunity. Furthermore, Dr. Griner has natural immunity from contracting the virus, which he argues provides superior immunity to any injection.&nbsp;Quoting Dr. Griner’s legal declaration: “The CMS Mandate, therefore, prevents me from realizing my lifelong dream of healing children and improving their lives through my expertise in performing craniofacial reconstructive surgery. I will be unable to pursue my career as a cleft lip, palate, and craniofacial surgeon because I will not have admitting privileges at the hospitals in the State of Utah and elsewhere in the country.”Dr. Griner’s lawsuit alleges that the medical treatments continue to be aggressively and illegally promoted as safe and effective “vaccines” despite the increasing and mounting scientific evidence to the contrary. Additionally, coercing healthy people to receive unwanted medical treatment is egregious and unconstitutional. Dr. Griner’s attorneys allege that the CMS Mandate violates an individual’s liberty which is protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and includes rights of personal autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity, and the right to reject medical treatment. The CMS Mandate also violates the “Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine,” under which the government may not condition a person’s employment or interfere with his right to refuse any medical treatment.&nbsp;Dr. Griner further declared, “I have exercised my fundamental right to decline medical treatment by declining to be injected with any preparations purporting to treat the symptoms of COVID-19, commonly referred to as COVID-19 vaccines.”<a href="https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/statement-cms-administrator-chiquita-brooks-lasure-us-supreme-courts-decision-vaccine-requirements" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The CMS Mandate affects 10.3 million healthcare workers at 76,000 medical facilities nationwide.&nbsp;</a> Dr. Griner, and other workers across the nation, have essentially been coerced by our government into a Faustian quid-pro-quo bargain requiring them to receive irrevocable, dangerous, and possibly deadly medical treatments, or lose their livelihood.The real victims of this illegal CMS Mandate are children who need cleft palate surgery. Countless innocent, Medicare-dependent children who require Dr. Griner’s surgical expertise will be unable to receive it. They are prohibited from receiving his services and unable to opt-out of the Medicare system to receive this life-saving surgery elsewhere.&nbsp;This case (Griner v. Biden, et al., 2:22-cv-00149-DAK) has been filed by Utah Attorneys Jefferson W. Gross and Seamus W. Appel, in collaboration with Attorney George Wentz of the Davillier Law Group in New Orleans, and with support from AFLDS.Dr. David Martin has also been instrumental in orchestrating this case, raising requisite funds for the suit, and extensively collaborated and strategized with counsel. Dr. Martin stated, “Our venue (Utah) gives us a rather unusual opportunity to take a civil action and have the Defendants expose themselves to criminal actions by virtue of their defense.”AFLDS is aligned with Dr. Martin and will continue to support Dr. Griner and the legal team.

AFLDS Backs Utah Surgeon’s Lawsuit Over Biden’s Unconstitutional Mandatory COVID-19 Medical Treatments for U.S. Healthcare Workers

San Francisco, CA – March 30, 2022, America’s Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) Senior Affiliate Attorney, Heather Gibson, represented San Francisco firefighter, William Amalu, who faced termination for choosing not to comply with the unconstitutional vaccine mandate implemented by the San Francisco Fire Department.Public comment was permitted prior to the hearing, the lines were flooded with fellow firefighters and residents in support of Amalu. They spoke passionately about what we all know to be true. Some notable comments include:“We know this isn’t about public health, this is about hundreds of millions of dollars of covid relief for 100% vaccine compliance. You are all puppets answering to your slave masters, committing horrible atrocities against these people, destroying livelihoods. We know the truth and you're complicit.”“[You are] Driven by Incompetence, laziness, power, or some other form of darkness.”"We've been awake, good Lord willing all of you will wake up soon. We will hope and pray that you all will wake soon.”Following public comment, Attorney Gibson presented similar testimony to the March 16, 2022, Kricken case, once again proving that the mandate is impossible to comply with, as no vaccine available prevents the spread of COVID-19.Similar to Kricken’s hearing, which we reported <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/post/william-amalu-hearing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, AFLDS coordinated for world renowned physician, Dr. Michael Yeadon, to testify on behalf of Mr. Amalu. However, only one day prior to the hearing, Commission President Feinstein, issued the following ruling:“Firefighter Amalu objects to the following witnesses identified by the Department – Chief Nicholson, Lucy Chu, Jesusa Bushong, and former Deputy Chief Velo. The objections are overruled. Any delay in formally identifying these witnesses was harmless, as all of these individuals were identified in the documents provided to Firefighter Amalu in this matter and in communications he was party to during the administrative process that preceded this matter. The Department should not present duplicative or cumulative testimony, and it has indicated that it will not.The Department objects to the testimony of Mike Yeadon, Ph.D., who Firefighter Amalu has offered to testify concerning COVID-19 vaccines. The objection is granted in part. Firefighter Amalu may offer the transcript of Dr. Yeadon’s testimony from the Kricken case as an exhibit in this matter.”During the hearing, Attorney Gibson requested that she be allowed to read 4-5 minutes of Dr. Yeadon’s testimony from a prior hearing onto the record and Commissioner Feinstein refused to allow this stating, “reading it into the record when it will become part of the record anyway just doesn't seem to be the best use of time.” She further stated that the testimony could notbe read because it had not been subject to cross examination, yet her ruling the prior day was the very reason Dr. Yeadon was not there to be cross-examined.Below, is wording directly from Dr. Yeadon regarding his scientific and professional opinions regarding Mr. Amalu.“To Mr. Amalu:-The record doesn’t show that he’s had an incident where he tested positive, nor does it say he’s ever been symptomatic with a respiratory illness in the last two years, absent a test or with only negative tests. One possible explanation is that he’s never acquired the infection. In this case, the only person at risk of encountering the virus in work for the city is Mr. Amalu himself. This wouldn’t be a problem. He’s very healthy. Only elderly and / or chronically ill people suffer greatly. He is neither. What we do appear to be able to say is that, through what’s claimed to be the worst pandemic in a hundred years, your client has remained in robust good health.-Providing Mr. Amalu only comes to work while he is feeling fit &amp; well, he presents no risk whatsoever either to his colleagues or the public. This is because only symptomatic people are infectious to the extent that infecting others occurs at a notable frequency. Healthy people don’t infect others, in different words. Even Dr Fauci concedes this. https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIj22KttYq7z/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33315116/-In my professional opinion, it’s more likely that Mr. Amalu has immunity to the virus already. Around 30% of people were shown to have “prior immunity” to this virus because of previous exposure to related viruses. I say this because he’s worked continuously through the period when many others fell ill. Alternatively, he acquired the infection during the last two years but displayed no symptoms as a result of his robust good health.”At the conclusion of testimony, the board again unanimously voted to confer in a closed session. During the closed session, one of the board members unmuted their mic and laughing was heard. The board was making the decision to end a dedicated first responders' career, and they were laughing in closed session, during a public hearing. This blatant corruption by board members, making a mockery of a hearing that is supposed to be based on evidence and law, is a plague against We the People.AFLDS continues to follow this story and report the truth.

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter, William Amalu, Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

Naples, FL—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) released the first episode of its documentary series,&nbsp;<a href="http://doctracy.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator</a>. Titled "Lawson’s Hunt," the episode features Dr. Christopher Rake as Doc Tracy, investigating those who are hunting doctors. &nbsp; AFLDS doctors are being hunted for standing up to government organizations. Institutions such as the CDC and California Medical Board are attempting to steal the livelihood from doctors who speak truth and follow the Hippocratic&nbsp;oath. Meanwhile, many states, such as Florida, have defended doctors who practice honorably, using common safe&nbsp;medications off-label to treat Covid. And in total contrast to California and the federal government, other states such as New Hampshire are making ivermectin available even without a prescription.&nbsp; &nbsp; The episode opens with Dr. Simone Gold, AFLDS founder, physician and attorney, introducing the tragic reality: there is a war on the medical profession. Individual doctors, such as Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Paul Marik, and Dr. Gold herself, are being targeted. Doc Tracy sets out to understand what - and who - is behind putting world-renowned doctors in their crosshairs.&nbsp; &nbsp; He's led to Kristina Lawson. Lawson is the President of the California Medical Board. Remarkably, she is NOT a doctor. She has no medical background whatsoever. Doc Tracy, of course, finds this troubling. So, he goes out on the street, doing "man on the street" style interviews to see what others think. Hilariously, he inquires about people's expectations. He finds out that people are just as startled and perplexed as he is. &nbsp; Doc Tracy then asks Lawson herself why she is silencing doctors. She is obviously bothered by this revelation being made public, with this opening episode in AFLDS's series exposing the machinations behind the pandemic and the draconian response by government and private actors.&nbsp; &nbsp; Dr. Gold stated, "The series is entertaining, but it's also incredibly informative. We provide an investigative treatment to a tragedy unfolding. We're sending a message to the medical establishment: we're coming for them. They're breaking the law and forcing doctors to violate their Hippocratic Oath or lose their medical license. We will not stand for it." &nbsp; Dr. Rake says, of Doc Tracy, "I'm proud to be a doctor, but I'm just as proud to be a civil rights activist, and that's what this series represents. It's civil rights activism at its finest. Today, social media is where the marches happen. We need to reach that audience and inform them. We have a culture that likes to see what is going on behind the scenes, firsthand, and that's what we're providing them, a window into a world many do not know." John Strand, AFLDS Creative Director, and the series' co-producer with Dr. Gold, stated, "Civil rights include the right to free speech, even when that speech goes against the mainstream narrative - of course, it’s especially essential when it goes against the mainstream narrative."&nbsp; &nbsp;AFLDS previously released the&nbsp;Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator&nbsp;trailer on January 29, 2022. The series is scheduled to release&nbsp;an&nbsp;undercover exposé or confrontation video&nbsp;on a regular basis.&nbsp;&nbsp;

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Confronts Kristina Lawson and the CA Medical Board with an episode of Doc Tracy.

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Confronts Kristina Lawson and the CA Medical Board with Doc Tracy!

San Francisco, CA - March 16, 2022, America’s Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) Senior Affiliate Attorney, Heather Gibson, represented San Francisco firefighter, Michael Kricken, who faced termination for choosing not to comply with the unconstitutional vaccine mandate implemented by the San Francisco Fire Department.Public comment was permitted before the hearing. Due to the overwhelming number of callers in support of Mr. Kricken, and against the mandate and actions of the Department, time limits for comment were reduced to two minutes per person. One caller described the actions of the San Francisco Fire Department as “…detrimental to fire service nationwide, frustrating, and disgusting.” Another stated the Fire Department was “…participating in mass genocide and violating the Nuremberg Code.”Following public comment, Attorney Gibson expertly presented an opening statement and evidence that it was impossible to comply with the San Francisco Fire Department’s vaccine mandate as the mandate requires firefighters to “receive a vaccine approved to prevent the transmission of COVID-19.” Ms. Gibson presented evidence that no vaccine yet exists that prevents the transmission of COVID-19, therefore the mandate is relying upon patently false information. The opposing side, in their concluding statements, concurred that no vaccine exists that prevents transmission, but then made the shocking request that the Department should be able to simply disregard the words in their regulation.Attorney Gibson also presented evidence that Mr. Kricken, who was infected with COVID-19 in 2020, still has antibodies two years later. The panel dismissed this scientific information. Attorney Gibson presented evidence that after having a fully vaccinated force of firefighters, the department still had had hundreds of Covid cases. Even with these undisputed facts the Department denied Mr. Kricken’s request for a religious exemption, stating he posed too great of a “threat” to others.AFLDS coordinated testimony from world-renowned scientific health expert, Dr. Michael Yeadon, on behalf of Mr. Kricken. Dr. Yeadon, former Pfizer executive, is the most qualified expert in the world to testify on the topics of COVID-19 injections and natural immunity. Dr. Yeadon provided scientific testimony to the superiority of natural immunity and the failure of any COVID-19 vaccination to prevent infection or transmission. The Department provided no expert rebuttal to Dr. Yeadon’s testimony.After testimony and closing arguments, the board voted unanimously to deliberate in a private session. Following a brief recess, the board returned with a unanimous decisionto terminate Mr. Kricken for noncompliance with their farcical mandate. Mr. Kricken will appeal. AFLDS will continue to follow Mr. Kricken’s story.The entire hearing may be accessed <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/post/aflds-attorney-heather-gibson-represents-san-francisco-firefighter-michael-kricken/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>, but was not yet available at the time of this press release.&nbsp;

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate.

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

Esteemed and courageous Founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, Simone Gold, MD, JD, made the difficult decision to agree to a&nbsp;plea&nbsp;deal&nbsp;regarding the activities of January 6.&nbsp;She pled to a&nbsp;misdemeanor for entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds.Dr. Gold, an emergency physician and attorney who spent years saving lives, has never&nbsp;denied her presence in the Capital.&nbsp;Recently, Dr. Gold stepped down from her position as a Board Member with AFLDS, and is focused on building a nationwide system of health and wellness clinics focused first and foremost on patient care.&nbsp;&nbsp;With regard to the prosecution of Dr. Gold for her speech in the Capitol on January 6, AFLDS protests a system whereby the laws are applied unequally, and notes that&nbsp;January 6 defendants are overwhelmingly victims of selective prosecution.We remember that in the summer of 2020 there were months of riots - and the DOJ brought no charges.&nbsp;We remember that in January 2017 hundreds of persons occupied&nbsp;the Capital, set fires in the street, burned cop cars, smashed windows - and again the DOJ did nothing.&nbsp;We The People&nbsp;are not free if our judicial system is weaponized: deployed to&nbsp;selectively prosecute some and restrained from prosecuting others.&nbsp;Our judiciary must enforce laws equally&nbsp;without favoritism or vengeance.&nbsp;America’s Frontline Doctors, the nation’s premier Civil Liberties organization, remains committed to our vital mission of regaining our lost freedoms and&nbsp;preserving&nbsp;all of our Constitutional rights.&nbsp;With the help of our&nbsp;tremendous supporters, we will keep fighting.&nbsp;Dr. Simone Gold is moving forward with a renewed focus on offering&nbsp;options besides&nbsp;the broken healthcare system which hurt so many patients and harmed our national interest.&nbsp;Her innovative new venture for wellness centers, aptly named Gold Care Health &amp; Wellness, will be announced shortly.Our support for Dr. Simone Gold will not waver and we continue to stand with her.

AFLDS Statement regarding the activities of January 6.

AFLDS Statement

New Orleans, LA—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed an amicus curiae brief to the state of Louisiana civil district court on February 18, 2022. The filing, in support of the plaintiffs in Andrews, et al. v. Cantrell, opposes the autocratic mayoral vaccine mandates requiring individuals to be vaccinated in order to enter and use public accommodations in New Orleans. &nbsp;Attorney David A. Dalia filed the amicus brief on behalf of AFLDS in support of the case brought by Attorney Laura Rodrigue and joined by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry against New Orleans’ mayor LaToya Cantrell. Cantrell had issued a “Mayoral Proclamation to Further Promulgate Emergency Orders… Due to Covid-19” on April 15, 2020. The executive action has remained in place despite scientific evidence showing it is irrational.&nbsp;The brief cites AFLDS doctors and medical specialists who advise utilizing evidence-based determinations to set policy to deal with Covid. Evidence shows that natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity, with waning immunity a major drawback associated with the Covid injections. &nbsp;AFLDS makes clear that the injections are actually treatments. Attorney Dalia’s brief lists several experts who recognize the reality that the Covid injections do not serve the traditional purpose of vaccinations, to stop transmission and provide immunity. The list includes NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Dr. Tal Zaks, and Oxford vaccine team lead Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, among others. Dr. Martin Kuldorff, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, makes the point clearly, “The bottom line is that these vaccines do not prevent transmission.” &nbsp;Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist states, as noted in the brief, “[I]t is really not logical to use [these] vaccines to protect other people… I don’t think they should be forced … simply because this vaccine does not prevent transmission. So, if you just think of the logic of it, what is the point of requiring a vaccine to protect others if that vaccine does not durably prevent onward transmission of a virus.”&nbsp;“There is simply no precedent in law for mandating healthy people take an injection that is temporally associated with hundreds of thousands of adverse events including heart attacks, stroke and death,” stated AFLDS founder, physician and attorney, Dr. Simone Gold. “It is the consensus that the injections don’t stop transmission or prevent infection. Numerous doctors and medical scientists attest to the fact that there are safe and effective alternative treatments. The mayor’s policy is arbitrary and counterproductive, and the mandates must stop.”&nbsp;Attorney Dalia argues, “The standard for evaluating an executive order such as the mayor’s proclamation is that it must be rational. And it fails to meet this basic requirement. The vaccine doesn’t create immunity. Even the FDA has classified these injections as ‘therapeutics.’ Under substantive due process analysis, the court must show that the action taken must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. The mandate, and the proclamation, is anything but.” &nbsp;Other states have already voluntarily dropped their mandates. D.C.’s Mayor Muriel Bowser ended its mandate affecting venues effective February 15, 2022. Florida similarly dropped its mandate. Recently, the Supreme Court struck down the OSHA mandate, ruling it as outside the authority of the executive agency. Attorney Dalia similarly argues, in addition to the constitutional arguments, the Mayor’s Proclamation is specifically forbidden by Louisiana state law which delegates to the legislative branch such measures. &nbsp;A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2022.&nbsp;

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated.

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

New Orleans, LA—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed an <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/amicus-curiae-brief-to-the-state-of-louisiana-civil-district-court/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">amicus curiae brief</a> to the state of Louisiana civil district court on February 18, 2022. The filing, in support&nbsp;of the plaintiffs in&nbsp;Andrews, et al. v. Cantrell, opposes the autocratic mayoral vaccine mandates requiring individuals to be vaccinated in order to enter and use public accommodations in New Orleans.&nbsp;Attorney David A. Dalia filed the amicus brief on behalf of AFLDS in support of the case brought by Attorney Laura Rodrigue and joined by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry against New Orleans’ mayor LaToya Cantrell. Cantrell had issued a “Mayoral Proclamation to Further Promulgate Emergency Orders… Due to Covid-19” on April 15, 2020. The executive action has remained in place despite scientific evidence showing it is irrational.The brief cites AFLDS doctors and medical specialists who advise utilizing evidence-based determinations to set policy to deal with Covid. Evidence shows that natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity, with waning immunity a major drawback associated with the Covid injections.&nbsp;AFLDS makes clear that the injections are actually treatments. Attorney Dalia’s brief lists several experts who recognize the reality that the Covid injections do not serve the traditional purpose of vaccinations, to stop transmission and provide immunity. The list includes NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Dr. Tal Zaks, and Oxford vaccine team lead Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, among others. Dr. Martin Kuldorff, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, makes the point clearly, “The bottom line is that these vaccines do not prevent transmission.”&nbsp;Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist states, as noted in the brief, “[I]t is really not logical to use [these] vaccines to protect other people… I don’t think they should be forced … simply because this vaccine does not prevent transmission. So, if you just think of the logic of it, what is the point of requiring a vaccine to protect others if that vaccine does not durably prevent onward transmission of a virus.”“There is simply no precedent in law for mandating healthy people take an injection that is temporally associated with hundreds of thousands of adverse events including heart attacks, stroke and death,” stated AFLDS founder, physician and attorney, Dr. Simone Gold. “It is the consensus that the injections don’t stop transmission or prevent infection. Numerous doctors and medical scientists attest to the fact that there are safe and effective alternative treatments. The mayor’s policy is arbitrary and counterproductive, and the mandates must stop.”Attorney Dalia argues, “The standard for evaluating an executive order such as the mayor’s proclamation is that it must be rational. And it fails to meet this basic requirement. The vaccine doesn’t create immunity. Even the FDA has classified these injections as ‘therapeutics.’ Under substantive due process analysis, the court must show that the action taken must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. The mandate, and the proclamation, is anything but.”&nbsp;Other states have already voluntarily dropped their mandates. D.C.’s Mayor Muriel Bowser ended its mandate affecting venues effective February 15, 2022. Florida similarly dropped its mandate. Recently, the Supreme Court struck down the OSHA mandate, ruling it as outside the authority of the executive agency. Attorney Dalia similarly argues, in addition to the constitutional arguments, the Mayor’s Proclamation is specifically forbidden by Louisiana state law which delegates to the legislative branch such measures.&nbsp;A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for March 3, 2022.

Naples, FL—America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) announced today it intends to file suit against The Intercept for defamatory publication. AFLDS has retained noted attorney Steven Biss to stop defamatory statements and seek financial damages from The Intercept, largely funded by billionaire Pierre Omidyar,&nbsp;the founder of eBay.&nbsp;On February 14, 2022, The Intercept ran a blatant hit piece designed to interfere with&nbsp;founder, physician and attorney,&nbsp;Dr. Simone Gold's medical license and with ALFDS's organization. Dr. Gold, an emergency room physician, formed AFLDS to help stop the medical tyranny that has taken hold of the country and world.&nbsp;Virtually everything printed in the article is false, including implying this is a Project Veritas initiative. AFLDS is inspired by Project Veritas’ unwavering commitment to hold power brokers accountable. Christian Hartsock did not do any actual work on the project nor did any other PV staff. Christian is a friend, but he was not involved in the production of this project.The article falsely calls AFLDS "disinformation doctors." Dr. Gold explains, "My words have been proven true time and time again, including most recently two weeks ago, by&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fmedia%2Fjohns-hopkins-university-study-lockdowns-media-blackout&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cevan%40aflds.org%7C109d84cb72794e462b2d08d9f184dbff%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637806375202421978%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=lTj7QR2YkAgXlCruOsXSD3B1o0F7EEZoVGMW%2BxMBbM4%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins University</a>. 21 months ahead of Johns Hopkins, in May 2020, I was the first doctor to publicly call the nation’s attention to the lethal effects of the&nbsp;<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fgracemarieturner%2F2020%2F05%2F22%2F600-physicians-say-lockdowns-are-a-mass-casualty-incident%2F%3Fsh%3D49c8f07450fa&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cevan%40aflds.org%7C109d84cb72794e462b2d08d9f184dbff%7Cb86874a894e144f8891fcd4fa7ac80e6%7C1%7C0%7C637806375202421978%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Efqeyz5jXop98DKPOt5dQJuyjL5c4obl0UtlW38afvw%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lockdowns</a>. Even two years later the media continues the lie, this time by a complete news blackout of the&nbsp;Johns Hopkins study by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC.”"Independent physicians like myself continue to inform all people about the efficacy of early treatment and the widespread failure of&nbsp;informed consent for the experimental injections. That there are no long-term studies; that there is extensive data proving the shots cause deadly clots; that natural immunity is superior; and that alternative safe treatments are available is not disinformation: that's&nbsp;information&nbsp;that is being censored by specific persons who have financial and political reasons to lie to the public."The Intercept defamatorily accuses AFLDS of "accost[ing]" Kristina Lawson, the California Medical Board's president in an undercover exposé titled&nbsp;Doc Tracy: Physician Investigator. The Intercept is lying.&nbsp;"For this undercover series, we adhered to the highest ethical standards to uncover egregious wrongdoing by the medical establishment. The claims by The Intercept and Lawson's claims she was 'ambushed' are utterly unfounded.”&nbsp;Dr. Gold added, "I'm an advocate for&nbsp;Constitutionally&nbsp;protected free speech, which does not protect lies and falsehoods. You cannot maliciously&nbsp;malign someone, accuse&nbsp;them falsely of harassing a member of the medical board. Undercover journalism is a legitimate means for uncovering truth in a free society. The Intercept is engaged in trying to take out doctors who are acting honorably."Attorney Steven Biss, who represents high profile individuals, such as Devin Nunez in his defamation suits, said, "We intend to put an end to The Intercept."AFLDS's Associate Medical Director Dan Stock stated, "The Intercept is involved in a&nbsp;campaign to destroy Dr. Gold and AFLDS. It invokes the cancel culture on Joe Rogan's Spotify channel, it goes after Dr. Malone, falsely stating he's discredited, he's not, that's not true. It's the mainstream media who is promoting disinformation about the vaccine's efficacy and safety, not Dr. Gold."Mr. Omidyar has reportedly donated $1.5 million to the World Economic Forum and he collaborates with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on a worldwide digital identity initiative. His motivation is clear, he's deliberately trying to take out dissenting opinions using his money and libel.&nbsp;

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept.

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Fort Worth, TX— February 4, 2022 - A Texas court <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/joint-status-report-document-55-fda-pfizer-case/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ordered </a>Wednesday, in Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) v. the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the FDA to provide documents in an expedited fashion, with overall favorable modifications to the prior order, according to an agreement between the FDA and the plaintiff in the case, PHMPT, represented by attorney Aaron Siri.This is a major win for America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) and other doctors fighting for information from the government.The Honorable Mark Pittman entered an order that requires the FDA to produce 10,000 pages of documents between it and Pfizer on or before March 1st, 10,000 more by April 1st, followed by another 80,000 pages each on May 1st, June 1st, and July 1st, then 70,000 pages on August 1st, followed by 55,000 pages a month on the first day of each month. Attorney Siri also negotiated a significant concession from the FDA that leads to a greater production of data per page to ensure duplicates do not cut into the page production.&nbsp;&nbsp;The FDA had sought to delay until May 1st the release of 55,000 pages of documents, which it had been previously <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/order-fda-pfizer-case-fort-worth/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ordered</a> to produce on March 1st.AFLDS had gone to court January 28, 2022 with doctors from all over the country to show support for the lawsuit against the FDA to obtain documents and against Pfizer’s motion to intervene, the latter which the judge has not ruled on yet. AFLDS has been fighting for more than a year now to give the public the information it needs to make informed decisions. Though the FDA requires informed consent for the EUA to be obtained, the informed consent requirement has been drastically watered down. "People are not being informed of the grave dangers of the vaccine," AFLDS affiliated doctor Dr. John Thomas, who was in the courtroom, emphasized. Dr. Thomas added, "Informed consent means having information about deaths and adverse events, the kind of data Pfizer has and gave to the FDA. The documents the FDA has should tell us a lot."Of the victory and need for information, Dr. Simone Gold stated, "The data is essential, every day that goes by we are in the dark as to what the government knew and relied upon. The data relates to the efficacy of the vaccine, how well it lasts - we know there is waning immunity - how variants evade the vaccine and perhaps, most importantly about how the vaccines do not prevent transmission."Dr. Brian Procter, a doctor affiliated with AFLDS, said, "The significance of the information and the urgency in obtaining it cannot be understated." He added, "Comirnaty is not available in the United States. Information obtained from the FDA, information we are seeking, can only help with giving people the information they need to provide informed consent."The attendance of more than fifteen doctors at the hearing, including Dr. Thomas and Dr. Procter, was essential to drive home to the judge that these are not abstract names on a page but real-life doctors and scientists in this battle to gain information from the government. Dr. Simone Gold noted that many of the doctors had dropped everything on 24-hour notice to be at the hearing because of the importance of this matter to the nation.The Court had given the parties one week to confer and come to an agreement on a revised schedule which allowed the government some room but not as much as they were seeking to produce the documents. The parties settled on an agreement that is a net win for transparency and a win for humanity.

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine 

Liberty Health Justice Mugs

Liberty Health Justice Tee

Freedom Fighters Raglan Tee

AFLDS Water bottles

Everything They Told You Is A Lie

CAPITOL PUNISHMENT

This 4th edition updates the brief essays that methodically examine the major Covid-19 issues – vaccines, masks, social distancing, natural immune systems, treatments ― to determine what is fact and what is myth in the current intensely political debate. The book is written by a family physician who pointedly differs on the threat posed by Covid-19 to the American people, then challenges current conventional wisdom on what should be done about the schools, the economy and public activity with reason, honesty and scientific facts.

The Trusted Name For

Independent Information

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism...

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice...

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply ...

Breaking News

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply

A Call to Action from
Dr. Simone Gold

Frontline News

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply

Biden claims to ‘support the Cuban people’ by strengthening communist state

COVID-19 vaccines and herd immunity – a changing narrative fraudulent from the start?

Homeschooling with the Kachuraks (Part II)

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab

Press Releases

Federal Judge Grants Motion for Summary Judgement Striking Down CDC’s Mask Mandate

AFLDS Backs Utah Surgeon’s Lawsuit Over Biden’s Unconstitutional Mandatory COVID-19 Medical Treatments for U.S. Healthcare Workers

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter, William Amalu, Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Confronts Kristina Lawson and the CA Medical Board with Doc Tracy!

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

AFLDS Statement

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine

How To Obtain Covid-19 Medication

Wear Freedom

Proudly

What's freedom
worth to you?

Support the cause

The Trusted Name For

Independent Information

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism...

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice...

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply ...

Breaking News

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply

A Call to Action from.css-qa8l2m{color:var(--chakra-colors-primary-500);}Dr. Simone Gold

Frontline News

Twitter exec caught mocking Elon Musk’s autism

Checkmate: Twitter’s impossible choice

Rude awakening: Surgeon General probe on COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ gets unexpected reply

Biden claims to ‘support the Cuban people’ by strengthening communist state

COVID-19 vaccines and herd immunity – a changing narrative fraudulent from the start?

Homeschooling with the Kachuraks (Part II)

World Health Assembly to vote on IHR amendments in unprecedented WHO power grab

Press Releases

Federal Judge Grants Motion for Summary Judgement Striking Down CDC’s Mask Mandate

AFLDS Backs Utah Surgeon’s Lawsuit Over Biden’s Unconstitutional Mandatory COVID-19 Medical Treatments for U.S. Healthcare Workers

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter, William Amalu, Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Confronts Kristina Lawson and the CA Medical Board with Doc Tracy!

America’s Frontline Doctors Represents San Francisco Firefighter Facing Termination over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandate

AFLDS Statement

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

AFLDS Files an Amicus Brief Challenging New Orleans Mayor Cantrell’s Public Accommodation Restrictions on the Unvaccinated

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Takes Aim at The Intercept

Doctors with America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Successfully Push Back on the FDA in Fight for Documents on the COVID Vaccine

How To Obtain Covid-19 Medication

Wear Freedom

Proudly

What's freedom .css-551n9x{display:inline;color:var(--chakra-colors-primary-500);}worth to you?

Support the cause

A Call to Action from
Dr. Simone Gold

What's freedom
worth to you?